9/28/2023 0 Comments Chimps breeding![]() On that, sometimes air strikes do kill innocent people, but bring chimps into context thwre. If a deep learning AI can use image analysis to determine what around it are cars and pedestrians and Lanes on roads effectively enough to create self driving cars that have 99% less accidents than humans than it is more than capable to determine an enemy soldier from a good one. Humans that are on the same side as the AI will have a chip implemented in them that sends a constant signal outward which will give instructions to the AI to not target. Train deep learning AI through hundreds of thousands of videos to identify humans with weaponry. ![]() What sense does it make to give animals something that they do not know that they lack?ĪI does not need to distinguish between moral wrongs and moral rights to target humans. The fact that animals cannot even remotely comprehend the concept of rights is a strong argument for why they should not have rights. It simply goes to show how that ethics is rooted in our evolutionary history. Even though some studies have shown that monkeys have a primitive sense of fairness (particularly when it applies to their own interest), it is but a pale anticipation of our sense of justice. Lacking all those mental abilities, animals have no sense of ethics. ![]() On social emotions like guilt, shame, pride and contempt on empathy and compassion, and on cultural heritage. To strengthen their case, animal right proponents invoke the “marginal case”: these include infants and those with significant mental impairment who, lacking superior intelligence, then should presumably be treated the same way as animals. If the only difference between humans and animals is that of a higher intelligence, does that justify that we treat ourselves better than the animals? Or is this just self-interested behavior, “speciesism”, as the animal rights proponent Richard Ryder has called it. However, the Theory of Evolution and modern physiology have pushed back against those beliefs, showing that there is an evolutionary continuum between animals and humans and that there are no fundamental differences between the physiology of the humans and other mammals source In the past, justification for human primacy over animals came from religions that stated that humans are superior to animals because they have an immortal soul, and that God commanded humans to rule over animals. Our intelligence? That may seem very logical because the basis of human rights is our ability to suffer, which in regards of that humans have the ability to feel happiness and suffer much more than animals but this isn't to say animals can't suffer at all. What makes humans so special that we deserve to be treated morally and animals don't. This is a fair point but must be taken into consideration. "But we are humans and they are animals." Would it be okay to gather 100 intelligent humans from around the world and forcefully breed them and put them into habitats until they did and then consistently observe their children? That would be very wrong right? ![]() I'll present you their moral side of the argument. ![]() Im not sure if it's illegal but you would face significant scrutiny from animal rights activists. Nurture argument and it's effect on intelligence. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |